It can't protect you against threats it doesn't realize are out there, which means antivirus developers are by definition reactive. Generally speaking, antivirus software is always one step behind viruses. Would antivirus have helped you here? Probably not. That risk increases when you start playing around with obscure PPAs and the like. As long as you keep to trusted repositories, the risk of catching malware is virtually zero. Installer files exist but are unconventional-most users rely solely on package managers like APT and YUM.
One mistake, one trick, and you're toast.īut Linux is different. That's a prime avenue for malware attacks.
On Windows and Mac, users often download EXE, MSI, and DMG installer files that request system-level access in order to make the necessary installation changes. Think about how you install software on your computer. Software Installations Are Safer on Linux However, it just isn't as big an issue as it is on other operating systems, and there's almost no chance you'll run into one (unless you're viewing inappropriate content or torrenting from disreputable sites). To say otherwise would just be naive and untruthful. Since Linux is the least popular desktop operating system and Linux users tend to be a tech-savvy bunch, other operating systems have easier security holes to exploit, and it simply isn't as profitable to attack Linux. Let's look at the reasons why you might not need antivirus software on Linux.
0 kommentar(er)
